Interested in contributing an asciidoctor syntax

ok, starting to make sense :slight_smile: So the “AsciiDoctor” syntax (which they still call “AsciiDoc”) is a superset of the official “AsciiDoc” syntax (from Eclipse), adding some new elements (and they don’t say explicitly which ones they add, they just mention two here but since they say “such as”, it hints that there could be more…).

I think the 2 they mention correspond to:

It’s a pity they don’t specify in AsciiDoc Language Documentation | Asciidoctor Docs when it’s the official syntax and when it’s addition to the syntax.

Actually I wonder if there isn’t a single syntax which is “AsciiDoc” and that syntax is extensible with macros and AsciiDoctor just adds some more macros. If this is the case then there’s no “AsciiDoctor” syntax. In XWiki we have the same thing, and specific macros are not part of the syntax (it’s only the macro syntax that is part of the syntax).